[Un problema diffuso, che suscita notevoli preoccupazioni a livello internazionale.]
Kolkata: Should you worry about ‘wireless allergies’?
Addressed with skepticism by most, the term electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) or wireless allergy or gadget allergy, is ascribed to a range of non-specific symptoms like headache and fatigue apparently due to heavy use of wireless communicating devices, especially those that emit electromagnetic radiation (EMR).
Common sources of this Wi-Fi tsunami include mobile phone signals, Wi-Fi hotspots, Wi-Fi enabled devices like tabs, cellphones, laptops and a plethora of other gadgets.
The controversial issue was recently thrust in the limelight when a French court in a landmark ruling granted disability allowance to a 39-year-old woman who claimed to be experiencing discomfort from alleged EHS. She was forced to live in a countryside barn far away from the Wi-Fi and the internet.
Despite such examples, the legitimacy debate rages on – is it a real thing or cooked up – fueled by the absence of hard evidence and conclusive research.
According to WHO, EHS has no clear diagnostic criteria and there is no scientific basis to link its symptoms to EMF (electromagnetic field) exposure, but it also says: “The symptoms are certainly real and can vary widely in their severity. Whatever its cause, EHS can be a disabling problem for the affected individual.”
Experts in India who have been studying such emerging problems (for example, the link between EHS and cellphone usage) say that with the introduction and expansion of wireless communication technologies, complaints related to mobile phones, base stations and gadgets have become more prominent.
“The radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RFR – a type of electromagnetic radiation) exposure levels have amplified manifold because of the extensive use of mobile phones and other devices,” Neeraj Kumar Tiwari, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM University, Lucknow, told IANS in an e-mail interview.
“Very common symptoms and sensations of EHS are irritation, headache, stammering, hearing loss, dizziness, ringing delusion, disrupted sleep, stress, fatigue and restlessness,” he added.
Further at the genetic level, electromagnetic radiation from mobiles cause damage if their exposure time and level are high, said M. Y. Khan, Dean, School for Biosciences and Biotechnology, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (BBAU), Lucknow, who has extensively dealt with the issue as a scientist.
In fact, he said, the situation in India compared to the West is worse. “Because we tend to use cheap mobile sets made by companies which do not follow the standard norms about the radiation safety,” Khan, Professor and Head, Department of Biotechnology at the varsity, said in an e-mail interview.
The electromagnetic fields produced by mobile phones are classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as possibly carcinogenic to humans.
Tiwari added that children may be more vulnerable than adults to EMF effects due to their “developing brain, greater absorption of energy in brain and a longer span of exposure over their lifetime”.
But all said and done, the fact is Wi-Fi, mobile phones and the internet are a necessity today, so much so that the number of internet connections in India has swelled to 300 million.
And, in a population of 1.25 billion, there are 980 million mobile connections, as per the latest data released by telecom regulator TRAI. Factor into this Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ‘Digital India’ initiative which will be driven by mobile technology.
The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) states EMFs produced by the antennae on mobile towers and mobile phones are at the lower end of the electromagnetic emission spectrum and are ‘non-ionizing radiations’, which means that the energy carried by them is not enough to break the chemical bonds between molecules.
“The Indian government has adopted one of the strictest global safety norms for EMF, which is one tenth of the emission levels (recommended by WHO) followed by most of the countries in the world.
“The government’s support and guidance in allaying the misplaced fears regarding EMF emissions from towers in the minds of the people would be paramount in addressing the issue of misplaced EMF fear psychosis, and help develop and deliver the Digital India dream of the government,” COAI Director General Rajan S. Mathews told IANS.
While EHS battles an existential crisis and as teenagers get more and more hooked to gadgets, Tiwari and Khan suggested ‘green communication’ – an approach to minimize the risks or defects associated with wireless communication systems.
Madhumita Dobe of the All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health stressed on more research on EHS in India.
As for now, following simple tips like texting instead of talking, keeping cellphones and gadgets at a distance and not placing cell phones under pillows is the way to go.
[Tra i nuovi 150 termini inseriti nel prestigiosissimo dizionario enciclopedico francese Larousse compare quello di Elettrosensibilità:
Electrosensibilité : “Ensemble des troubles physiques dus, selon la description des personnes atteintes, à une sensibilité excessive aux ondes et aux champs électromagnétiques ambiants.
Questo è ciò che accade nei paesi attenti alle problematiche sociali e sanitarie.]
Ce lundi 18 mai, le dictionnaire Larousse a dévoilé les nouveaux mots qui entreront dans son édition 2016. Parmi ces mots, celui d’électrosensibilité.
La définition de ce terme donnée par le dictionnaire est la suivante : « ensemble des troubles physiques dus, selon la description des personnes atteintes, à une sensibilité excessive aux ondes et aux champs électromagnétiques ambiants »
Pour Michèle RIVASI, députée européenne spécialiste des questions de santé ; « l’entrée de ce nouveau mot dans le dictionnaire, utilisé depuis des années par des associations et des médecins spécialistes de l’électrosensibilité, est une reconnaissance symbolique mais très importante de l’existence de cette pathologie.
Aujourd’hui, de nombreuses études montrent les effets biologiques des ondes électromagnétiques issus de la téléphonie mobile ou du wifi, notamment sur le cerveau, mais il est encore très compliqué de comprendre le mécanisme de sensibilité aux ondes. L’ANSES réalise actuellement un rapport sur le sujet, pour lequel j’ai d’ailleurs j’ai été auditionnée, et qui est très attendu par les personnes électrosensibles et leurs proches.
Je travaille actuellement avec plusieurs électrosensibles pour la création d’un lieu d’accueil, de suivi médical et de recherche sur l’électrosensibilité, afin de mieux comprendre cette pathologie et aider les électrosensibles à se ressourcer pour mieux vivre.
Ce même jour, je participais à un grand colloque à l’Académie Royale de Médecine de Belgique avec plusieurs scientifiques qui annoncent de grands problèmes de santé publique si l’expsoiton, aux ondes n’est pas mieux encadrée. Lors de ce colloque, nous avons appelé l’OMS à agir sur le sujet, notamment pour protéger les femmes enceintes et les enfants, et à reconnaitre l’électro sensibilité et la chimico-sensibilité.
Depuis plusieurs années, les écologistes et les associations réclament la reconnaissance de l’électrosensibilité par le ministère de la santé français, comme en Suède. J’espère que cette avancée dans la langue française présage d’une avancée côté politique et sanitaire.
18 maggio 2015 – “Priartem et le Collectif des Electrosensibles de France”
[Tra i nuovi 150 termini inseriti nel prestigiosissimo dizionario enciclopedico francese Larousse compare quello di Elettrosensibilità:
Electrosensibilité : “Ensemble des troubles physiques dus, selon la description des personnes atteintes, à une sensibilité excessive aux ondes et aux champs électromagnétiques ambiants.
Questo è ciò che accade nei paesi attenti alle problematiche sociali e sanitarie.]
Ce lundi, le vénérable dictionnaire Larousse dévoile les 150 nouveaux mots de son édition 2016, parmi eux : l’électrosensibilité, avec cette définition :
“ensemble des troubles physiques dus, selon la description des personnes atteintes, à une sensibilité excessive aux ondes et aux champs électromagnétiques ambiants”.
Pour Sophie Pelletier, porte-parole d’Electrosensibles de France / Priartem, c’est un symbole extrêmement fort : « Après son entrée en janvier dernier dans la loi Abeille sur la sobriété en matière d’ondes, le terme électrosensibilité est maintenant validé par une référence de la langue française. Cette définition, simple, consacre la réalité somatique des troubles tout en évitant habilement l’ornière de la controverse sur leur origine ».
Rappelons que les chiffres les plus récents concernant cette affection la consacre comme un véritable problème de santé publique : dans les années 90, en Californie, 5 personnes pour 1000 avaient déclaré avoir dû changer de travail pour cause d’électrosensibilité et 17% des employées d’une firme multinationale de télécommunications suédoise en étaient affectés ; une fourchette de 8 – 10 % de la population, atteinte à des degrés divers, est admise aujourd’hui concernant l’Allemagne ; la France ne dispose toujours d’aucun chiffre officiel, malgré nos demandes (1).
Pour Sophie Pelletier, cette définition est globalement satisfaisante dans l’état actuel de la controverse mais elle doit pouvoir évoluer avec l’avancée des connaissances car si aujourd’hui on en connaît très peu sur l’électrosensibilité elle-même, de plus en plus d’études apportent des éclairages sur l’impact des ondes sur l’organisme et sur la variabilité des réactions individuelles à ces agressions environnementales : « Aujourd’hui, on ne connaît quasiment rien sur les mécanismes produisant cette perte de tolérance aux ondes et si plusieurs méthodes diagnostic existent, aucune ne fait référence au niveau académique. Malheureusement, la Haute Autorité de Santé se refuse toujours à se pencher sur cette maladie environnementale émergente. L’ANSES, quant à elle, doit remettre un rapport et nous espérons que certaines données fondamentales concernant les effets biologiques des ondes, notamment sur le cerveau, pourront être mises en lumière. Après cette entrée dans le dictionnaire, nous attendons avec impatience que l’électrosensibilité fasse un jour son entrée dans le Larousse médical ! ».
4 settembre 2015 – “stuff.co.nz – well&good”, by Mark White
IT specialist Steve Weller describes the pain of EMS as like “a tight-fitting hat being pulled down on your head”.
Hellish headaches are just the start for people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity – and in our wi-fi world, there’s almost nowhere to hide.
After an hour of measuring radio-frequency levels around Benalla, the north-eastern Victorian city of 9300 deep in Ned Kelly country, Australia, Bruce Evans puts down his smartphone-sized digital meter.
He says he wants to demonstrate how badly cordless phones leak radiation, and there’s one in the Benalla bookshop he can test. He strides off with intent on a sunny Sunday morning, a burly man with a shaved head, like a friendly bouncer you nonetheless wouldn’t want to mess with.
EHS sufferer Bruce Evans.
Evans, a 50-year-old web designer and former Australian Army commando, is showing me where he can go without falling ill. He says he has a controversial condition known as electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS), triggered by electromagnetic fields (EMF) emitted by power lines, devices such as smartphones and laptops, by wireless routers and towers pumping out telco and NBN signals – the building blocks of the modern economy; indeed, of modern living as we know it.
Symptoms range from a mild headache through to tingles, tinnitus and heart palpitations to incapacitating migraines, fatigue and nausea. Being EHS puts a huge mental strain on sufferers, both from their symptoms and from not being believed.
EHS is contentious because the radio-frequency levels at which sufferers say they’re affected fall well below those considered dangerous by regulators. And its existence is denied by mainstream medicine. While allergies can be tested with a needle-prick blood sample, there is no accepted diagnostic test for EHS, so most sufferers are self-diagnosed. “The collection of symptoms,” says a World Health Organisation (WHO) fact sheet, “is not part of any recognised syndrome.”
Theo R, who has moved to an isolated property with his partner Irma.
We enter the bookshop. Evans doesn’t recognise the young woman behind the counter. He reaches into his backpack and removes his meter. “I was wondering if I could just measure the telephone?” he asks.
“Hi,” I add. “I’m from Good Weekend magazine, we’re doing a story about – ” I fumble briefly ” – how some electrical items leak electricity … ”
The woman freezes. “I’m sorry,” she finally says. “If I had some proof of who you are … ”
Signs outside Theo and Irma’s home.
We leave without the measurement but with a glimpse into Evans’ world. “She was probably looking for the big red button under the counter to call the Men in Black,” he jokes.
Sufferers of EHS say they are environmental refugees in their own country, moving to other cities or suburbs or retreating to remote rural hideaways to escape their symptoms. I spoke to a dozen sufferers, some of whom coat their houses in paint that reflects electromagnetic radiation (EMR), fit wire mesh over their windows, or wear protective caps made of cotton-metal-blend fabric. Shielding items cost dearly: one online business lists a five-litre pot of paint for NZ$550 and a protective iPhone 6 case for NZ$60. “The number of people contacting us with EMR-related problems is absolutely growing,” says EMR Australia director Lyn McLean.
Steve Weller, a 46-year-old IT specialist, moved his family from Melbourne to Brisbane because of EHS, but continues to search for a “haven”. He describes his symptoms as akin to “a tight-fitting hat being pulled down on your head, often accompanied by a pricking feeling over the scalp”.
Bruce Evans with his smartphone-sized digital meter.
Wendy McClelland, 57, has been on a government disability pension since 2003 because of her EHS symptoms. She covers her face with a shielding cloth and sunglasses when she drives into Ballarat from her isolated property in country Victoria – and has been abused at traffic lights because people think she’s Muslim.
Bruce Evans has a vision for sufferers of EHS. He wants to build a community in an area of low EMF emissions, known as a White Zone, where victims can live and thrive together. There are a handful globally, largely in northern Europe and the US. Evans’ community could take root at his dad’s farm at Myrrhee, in north-east Victoria, on land his family has worked for 150 years. It could then expand through the valley, a dead zone for mobile phone signals … for now, at least.
The WHO insists there’s “no scientific basis” for a link between EMF exposure and EHS, but agrees the symptoms are real. Estimates of EHS’s prevalence vary widely, from one in 30 people to a few in a million.
EHS sufferer Irma.
The Australian Medical Association declined to comment on EHS. Michael Repacholi, the Australian former co-ordinator of the WHO’s Radiation and Environmental Health unit, says studies show “as conclusively as possible” that sufferers’ symptoms are not due to EMF, but could have another explanation. He suggests EHS could be “psychosomatic”.
But sufferers insist their symptoms are real, and caused by EMF. “Cate”, a 43-year-old project manager in health evaluation in Sydney, doesn’t want her name published because she’s worried she’ll be “pigeon-holed by colleagues”. She believes she’s a likely EHS sufferer – it’s the only explanation for five years of severe nausea, muscle weakness, migraines and body tingling.
After she moved from her inner-city unit to outer Sydney, where a friend of hers has measured 16,000 times less EMF exposure, she says her health improved significantly. A nodule on her thyroid, which was set for surgery, stopped growing.
EHS has had some high-profile sufferers, including Gro Harlem Brundtland, a former Norwegian prime minister and WHO director-general, who banned mobile phones in her office as they gave her headaches.
Chuck, a character with EHS in the Breaking Bad spin-off series Better Call Saul, confines himself to his house, which has the electricity disconnected. In one episode he sprints outside for a few seconds, wrapped in a metallic sheet that flaps behind him like Batman’s cape. His vision blurs and a howling noise rings in his ears.
Steve Weller has watched this and says the sounds were added for dramatic effect: “Some people experience tinnitus from exposure events, but not like on the program.” Weller started suffering symptoms – heart palpitations and headaches – when he installed a wireless router in his home in 2001. The symptoms immediately dissipated once he turned the router off. He went on to spend more than NZ$22,000 on shielding his house, which didn’t stop the pain and discomfort coming on when he was outdoors.
In 2013, he finally left Melbourne to escape the compulsory statewide rollout of smart meters to measure electricity use, commonly blamed by Victorian EHS sufferers as provoking symptoms.
The notion of EHS would once have been “rubbish” to Weller. “I was addicted to my smartphone and playing computer games,” he says. Wireless technology gives us so much freedom that people don’t want to accept that it may come with a cost, he adds.
Bruce Evans is gloomily contemplating an NBN tower about to go live at Moyhu, near his favourite burger joint. The north-eastern Victorian town is just over the lip of the valley in which he lives.
Evans moved to a cottage adjoining his dad’s farm in 2012 after five years of deepening health problems in Melbourne. These began when he first used an iPhone. (“Bang! It was like someone had stuck an ice-pick in my head,” he says.) His symptoms intensified in line with the rollout of the 3G mobile network and smart meters.
During Evans’ last two years in Melbourne, he only left his room to buy food. His social life disintegrated and he couldn’t attend business meetings. Years earlier, he’d met a woman with a sensitivity to chemicals who refused to get in a car. “I was like, ‘Pffft, loony’ … I met a couple of other people in similar situations and I just wrote them off as nuts, bloody sensitive little namby-pambies. Then it started happening to me.”
Evans drives up a mountain to show me the valley in which he dreams that dozens of White Zones homes could be built. He stops to read his meter. It’s hundreds of times his safe limit. “Oh f…,” he says, reversing the van, away from the danger zone. Five minutes later, he touches his top of his head. “I’ve got pressure here.”
Evans posted his idea for a community on the web. One line read: “I want this area declared a sanctuary where telcos cannot infringe.”
The post went viral and emails poured in from around Australia and abroad. Theo R, 60, contacted him from a caravan on the Gwydir River, in NSW’s Northern Tablelands, where he was living with his partner, Irma, 55. The couple had moved to the tablelands in 2014, their only guests the occasional fisherman and flocks of native birds. Irma’s EHS is so severe, Theo had to construct an EMF-blocking Faraday cage – pasting heat-reflective foil over their entire mobile home.
Clinical studies have shown that sufferers frequently can’t tell when an EMF source is present; they only have symptoms when they believe one exists. Other studies indicate that the effects of EMF on laboratory animals, plants and human cells are real. These conflicting results are cited by EHS sufferers and sceptics as proof that each side is right.
Professor Rodney Croft, of the Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research at the University of Wollongong, is keeping an open mind on whether EHS exists, despite his own research casting doubt on the claims of some sufferers, which he is now re-conducting. “My feeling is [their condition] won’t end up being due to radio frequencies, but there is a large number of people with quite serious problems,” he notes. “It’s very real.”
One way to prove EHS is real is with “provocation tests” – introducing and removing frequencies and asking sufferers to match their presence to their symptoms. According to Steve Weller, these tests can’t reliably distinguish genuine EHS victims from those suffering a possible “nocebo” effect (generating adverse symptoms themselves). Weller says that biological tests are a better way of testing for the condition.
Former Sydney University physics lecturer Jim McCaughan agrees. Provocation tests, he argues, “assume the brain is acting as a meter”. He believes that damage from EMF is cumulative.
McCaughan was forced to retire from academia after a sudden EHS onset in 2013, when he felt his brain “rippling” under his skull. “That was scary,” he says. When we meet in a Sydney cafe, he’s wearing a smart cream hat; underneath it are seven skullcaps made of shielding fabric which he says reduces his EMF exposure by 99 per cent. McCaughan speaks with a veteran lecturer’s rational tone. If he wears the shielding, he can function normally – if he doesn’t, he could pay for it later. That’s enough to prove a link, he insists.
The most high-profile official recognition of EHS in Australia occurred in 2013, when the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) awarded compensation to former CSIRO senior research scientist David McDonald. When he was hired in 1994, he told CSIRO he had EHS and was granted an assistant to help with computer work.
That help was withdrawn in 2006, and he was required to trial electronic equipment. Each time, he suffered nausea, headaches and migraines. Government insurer Comcare argued EHS is not an “ailment” as it has no diagnostic criteria, but the AAT dismissed this and ruled that CSIRO had worsened his EHS symptoms.
By 2009, as his condition worsened, McDonald, now 61, had to move with wife Lynne, 54, from their inner-city Melbourne house to a 40-hectare farm north of the city. They use a low-voltage electricity system, which runs the tiny TV on which he watches his footy team, Hawthorn, play. Going to a game is out of the question and his career is finished. “I’m not whinging about it,” he says. “I’ve just had to restrict my activities a great deal. Not working has been a huge restriction for me.”
His GP Russell Cooper’s diagnosis of EHS in 1992 formed part of the evidence at McDonald’s tribunal. While not commenting on McDonald’s case, Cooper says he sees sufferers react to WiFi in his Tasmanian practice if it is turned on. And he believes he’s identified a way to test for EHS – the first – which is being developed in a Greek laboratory, based on variations in “heat shock protein” genes that help protect people from radiation exposure. “It’s early days yet,” he says.
In the meantime, a grassroots movement is growing across Australia against new mobile or NBN towers. The community-based OREAD Project in Kyogle, NSW, adopted a biological approach to testing EMF effects ahead of a proposed NBN tower in the area. Twelve residents had their blood analysed, and the results were sent to NBN Co., Visionstream and Ericsson by Nimbin solicitor David Spain. If the tower is erected and subsequent blood tests show their health has been compromised, Spain says there could be grounds for an injunction or as a precedent in future planning cases.
If EHS is real, then the implications of more and more WiFi are scary. Lynne McDonald believes her husband could be one of the “coal-mine canaries” for EMF effects.
Bruce Evans enters a two-storey building on his dad’s farm where dormitory accommodation might be sited. The ground floor is a jumble of machinery, creating an obstacle course to the ladder leading upstairs. On the upper level, there are bird droppings on the floor and ripped cladding hanging from the ceiling. Seasonal hops pickers used to bunk here, but not recently.
His dad, John, 76, is outside. He resembles an older version of Bruce and also suffers from EHS. “I gave him an iPhone once and he was a write-off for two days,” says Bruce. “Yeah,” replies his father. What does dad think of having people with EHS here? “We’ve got all these old buildings here not being used for anything. We could have a set-up where people could come.”
The summit of a nearby hill is speckled with blackberry bushes, splats of dung and a few rabbits darting out of sight. Huts could be built here and on the facing slope. John is an irrigation engineer, so they can pump water up the hill. A dam in an adjoining hollow could be a recreation area for fishing. Evans works in the cottage at a kidney-shaped desk, with filters over the computer screens. He’s built a website called Radiation Refuge to match EHS sufferers with suitable accommodation, which had 14 listings in August.
You sense Evans thought his White Zone would be a simple undertaking: declare it open and they will come. But Diane Schou, who lives with about 50 other sufferers at the White Zone of Green Bank, West Virginia, warns there’s a lot to consider. “We are all different,” she says. “Certain frequencies seriously harm some of us, but do not harm others.”
Evans has learned that lesson the hard way, with several sufferers finding it difficult to stay there, and a recent one having problems as soon as she entered the valley. His first visitor, Kaytie Wood, felt the cottage was “not a safe place”. Wood, a 58-year-old energy healer, had an immediate headache as soon as she arrived. Evans turned off various items, including a smart meter housed 70 metres away in a shed. That helped, but over the next day she became steadily worse: her headache grew, she became nauseous and could barely move. “It was like having an all-over-the-body migraine and the power was off there,” says Wood. “It must have been something else.”
Evans convinced his sister – who runs a goat farm over the road – to turn off her electric fences, which helped. Wood camped outdoors the second night. “I think there was a lot of learning for Bruce,” she says. “He discovered we’re sensitive to different things.”
The NBN tower at Moyhu was recently turned on. Evans can’t measure any difference with his meters, but now feels like he has “termites in his head” when he goes for a run up the road.
In July, he discovered a mobile phone tower will be erected – he’s not sure when – on a hill he can see from his office window. His dream of a White Zone seems over. He doesn’t know how he will cope. He’ll have to take to the road and is hoping someone will donate a caravan for him to live in.
Theo R and Irma might have a solution. They moved in May to NSW’s Central West, to an abandoned five-room homestead on 160 hectares, owned by a friend, by the Warrumbungle National Park. Theo repaired the doors and windows and dug a new dunny pit. Irma has regained her energy and is thinking of starting a business. They’re inviting people with EHS to camp there.
“The scenery is second-to-none,” Theo says. “It’s a little miracle.”
27 agosto 2015 – “La Depeche”, a cura di Paul Arnaud
[Articolo in Francese]
“La Santé près de chez vous – Électrosensibilité”
“Marine Richard a vu son hypersensibilité aux ondes électromagnétiques reconnue comme handicap par la justice. Elle en appelle à la création de zones blanches pour les électrosensibles.
Elle fait la Une de tous les médias de France mais refuse les photos et tient à rester discrète et tranquille, à l’abri des ondes, dans sa maison de pierres des Pyrénées ariégeoises. Elle ? Marine Richard qui se définit comme «une réfugiée environnementale», est devenue en quelques heures le porte-voix des électrosensibles après la décision du tribunal du contentieux de l’incapacité de Toulouse qui a reconnu comme handicap son syndrome d’hypersensibilité aux ondes électromagnétiques «dont la description des signes cliniques est irréfutable» (lire notre édition du 26 août). Un syndrome dont Marine Richard, ancienne journaliste et auteur dramatique, souffre de puis 2010. Elle milite dans de nombreuses associations engagées contre les ondes électromagnétiques.
Comment êtes-vous arrivée en Ariège ?
Je me considère comme une réfugiée environnementale. J’ai cherché pendant 1 an et demi, avant d’arriver en Ariège en 2012, un endroit protégé des ondes, où je puisse survivre sans souffrir physiquement.
Vous parlez de survie…
Le mot n’est pas trop fort étant donné les troubles physiques dont j’ai été affectée.
Comment cela se traduit-il ?
Il y a plusieurs types de symptômes. Les premiers sont des douleurs intracrâniennes extrêmement violentes qui peuvent aller de la sensation d’avoir une perceuse qui vous transperce le cerveau ou une sensation d’étau qui vous écrase la tête. Ce sont des douleurs insoutenables qui descendent aussi le long de la colonne vertébrale. Vous avez l’impression que votre tête va exploser. Viennent d’autres problèmes, cardiaques et neurologiques, qui affectent la concentration.
Ces symptômes peuvent-ils disparaître ?
Ces symptômes régressent quand on se trouve à l’abri des ondes. Des études scientifiques montrent que lorsqu’une personne sensible est exposée à des ondes, elle peut avoir une oxygénation cérébrale qui est à 30 % de la normale. Quand elle est à l’abri des ondes, son cerceau fonctionne normalement. ça rend la vie impossible. Le mot survie n’est pas trop fort.
Ce syndrome se soigne ?
La seule thérapie efficace est de se protéger des champs magnétiques. Il y a aussi des palliatifs qui permettent de supporter. Cela fait régresser les symptômes mais ne soigne pas la maladie qui est environnementale.
Votre victoire devant le tribunal va-t-elle faire jurisprudence ?
Il n’y a aucune raison que cela ne le fasse pas. Au-delà de mon cas personnel, il y a des milliers de personnes qui sont dans un état de souffrance intolérable. Cette première victoire va servir d’autres contentieux en cours contre des maisons du handicap ailleurs en France.
Peut-elle faire évoluer la réglementation ?
C’est compliqué de répondre. Le problème aujourd’hui est que les instances décisionnaires sont conseillées par les lobbys. À termes, il est inéluctable que l’état créé des zones protégées pour que certaines personnes atteintes de pathologies comme l’électrosensibilité puissent survivre. Je viens de recevoir le message d’un proche d’une personne qui s’est suicidée car elle ne tolérait plus sa souffrance physique et ne trouvait pas d’endroit où se réfugier.
Selon vous, il faut créer des «réserves» sans ondes ?
Malheureusement, oui. C’est intolérable de dire une chose pareille car on affirme qu’il faut exclure ces gens mais ils sont déjà exclus et ils souffrent physiquement. Il y a urgence à créer des zones blanches, protégées des champs électromagnétiques où des personnes trop affectées peuvent survivre en attendant que la société évolue et qu’on impose aux opérateurs d’abaisser les seuils de pollution. Et ça, c’est une volonté politique qui ne dépend pas de gens comme moi.
Marine Richard a écrit un livre présenté comme « un thriller rocambolesque.» «Sans mobile», Marine Richard, Le Square éditeur.
Presented at the Corporate Interference with Science and Health: Fracking, Food, and Wireless, Scandinavia House, New York, NY, March 13 and 14, 2013.
by Magda Havas
Abstract:
Exposure to electrosmog generated by electric, electronic, and wireless technology is accelerating to the point that a portion of the population is experiencing adverse reactions when they are exposed. The symptoms of electrohypersensitivity (EHS), best described as rapid aging syndrome, experienced by adults and children resemble symptoms experienced by radar operators in the 1940s to the 1960s and are well described in the literature. An increasingly common response includes clumping (rouleau formation) of the red blood cells, heart palpitations, pain or pressure in the chest accompanied by anxiety, and an upregulation of the sympathetic nervous system coincident with a downregulation of the parasympathetic nervous system typical of the “fight-orflight” response. Provocation studies presented in this article demonstrate that the response to electrosmog is physiologic and not psychosomatic. Those who experience prolonged and severe EHS may develop psychologic problems as a consequence of their inability to work, their limited ability to travel in our highly technologic environment, and the social stigma that their symptoms are imagined
rather than real. Keywords: electrosmog; radio-frequency radiation; rouleau; tachycardia; WiFi; Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome.
Versione completa in PDF scaricabile al seguente link:
[Lettera all’editore di “Bioelectromagnetic” da parte di due ricercatori Europei, sulla base di indagini epidemiologiche internazionali. Se l’incremento dei malati continuerà con linearità, entro il 2017 il 50% della popolazione mondiale sarà elettroipersensibile.]
1 Hallberg Independent Research, Trångsund, Sweden 2 Public Health Department Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
Dear Editor,
Each year an increasing number of people claim to suffer from electrosensitivity (see, e.g., compilation of references given in Table 1), also known as being electrically hypersensitive (EHS). There are also other diseases, such as fibromyalgia and burn-out syndrome, that have symptoms similar to those exhibited by people suffering from electrosensitivity.
In Sweden, electrosensitivity is recognized as a handicap, but there is still controversy surrounding the diagnosis of the disease. The mainstream view by governmental and medical authorities is that this handicap is a psychological phenomenon with no basis in physical or medical mechanisms (Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, SNBHW, 1995), whereby perpetuating the misconception that only a small fraction of the population is concerned about electrosensitivity or the proximity of new radio transmission masts.
The number of reported cases of electrosensitivity has been steadily increasing since it was first documented in 1991. Data presented here are estimates and are based on large sample inquiries where different sets of questions have been used. To determine whether the statistics indicate a sub-population of electrosensitivity or if the total population is at stake, we plotted reported prevalence estimates over time in a normal distribution diagram (Table 1 and Figure 1).
Contrary to the views of mainstream medical authorities, Figure 1 shows that the group of electrosensitive people around the world, including Sweden, is not just a small fraction that deviates from the rest of the healthy population. Instead, it points at the possibility that electrosensitivity will be more widespread in the near future. The extrapolated trend indicates that 50% of the population can be expected to become electrosensitive by the year 2017.
Data presented here were collected in Austria, Germany, Great Britain, Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States.
Figure 1. The prevalence (%) of people around the world who consider themselves to be electrosensitive, plotted over time in a normal distribution graph. The endpoint at 50% is an extrapolated value. Variation explained is 91%, the endpoint not included.
As the prevalence of wireless telecommunication escalates throughout the world, health professionals are faced with the challenge of patients who report symptoms they claim are connected with exposure to some frequencies of electromagnetic radiation (EMR). Some scientists and clinicians acknowledge the phenomenon of hypersensitivity to EMR resulting from common exposures such as wireless systems and electrical devices in the home or workplace; others suggest that electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) is psychosomatic or fictitious. Various organizations including the World Health Organization as well as some nation states are carefully exploring this clinical phenomenon in order to better explain the rising prevalence of non-specific, multi-system, often debilitating symptoms associated with non-ionizing EMR exposure. As well as an assortment of physiological complaints, patients diagnosed with EHS also report profound social and personal challenges, impairing their ability to function normally in society. This paper offers a review of the sparse literature on this perplexing condition and a discussion of the controversy surrounding the legitimacy of the EHS diagnosis. Recommendations are provided to assist health professionals in caring for individuals complaining of EHS.
Accepted by:
David E. McCarty, M.D., Simona Carrubba, Ph.D., Andrew L.
Chesson, Jr., M.D., Clifton Frilot, II, Ph.D., Eduardo GonzalezToledo,
M.D., Andrew A. Marino, Ph.D.
doi:10.3109/00207454.2011.608139
ABSTRACT
Objective: We sought direct evidence that acute exposure to environmentalstrength electromagnetic fields could induce somatic reactions (EMF hypersensitivity). Methods: The subject, a female physician self-diagnosed with EMF hypersensitivity, was exposed to an average (over the head) 60Hz electric field of 300 V/m (comparable to typical environmental-strength EMFs) during controlled provocation and behavioral studies. Results: In a double-blinded EMF provocation procedure specifically designed to minimize unintentional sensory cues, the subject developed temporal pain, headache, musclet-witching, and skipped heartbeats within 100 s after initiation of EMF exposure (P < 0.05). The symptoms were caused primarily by field transitions (off-on, on-off) rather than the presence of the field, as assessed by comparing the frequency and severity of the effects of pulsed and continuous fields in relation to sham exposure. The subject had no conscious perception of the field as judged by her inability to report its presence more often than in the sham control. Discussion: The subject demonstrated statistically reliable somatic reactions in response to exposure to subliminal EMFs under conditions that reasonably excluded a causative role for psychological processes. Conclusion: EMF hypersensitivity can occur as a bona fide environmentally-inducible neurological syndrome.
29 agosto 2015 – Il Fatto Quotidiano”, di Maurizio Martucci
“O perbacco: la notizia ha sconfinato le Alpi, approdando persino sul Tg1. E allora, apriti cielo, se ne sta parlando da alcuni giorni: il Tribunale di Tolosa ha sancito il riconoscimento di invalidità civile (più l’accompagnamento) ad una donna francese affetta da Elettrosensibilità, nuova malattia da società occidentale informatizzata (il lato oscuro del Digital divide e della Banda Ultra Larga! Una sorta di ‘allergia’ alle radiazioni da Wi-Fi, cellulari, Pc, ripetitori-antenne di telefonia mobile, che costringe a scappare, ritirandosi dalla società, per scongiurare violente e dolorose reazioni infiammatorie del corpo in rivolta) che l’establishment medico-scientifico-istituzionale fatica a riconoscere, nonostante l’evidenza di casi in esponenziale crescita e studi indipendenti come il lavoro della Commissione Internazionale per la Sicurezza dei Campi Elettromagnetici (ICEMS).
Imbarazza che, ancora una volta, il monito arrivi quindi dai togati e non dall’OMS, dallo IARC o da politiche governative di precauzione, vocati alla tutela della salute pubblica dall’indiscriminato utilizzo di apparecchiature a emissione di onde elettromagnetiche, in dote persino ai bambini come fossero giocattoli. Ma a dire il vero, la cosa non mi sorprende più di tanto se, al netto di astruse tesi complottistiche, penso ai continui richiami su trasparenza e assenza di conflitti di interesse degli operatori decisionali oppure al fatto che nelle casse dello Stato piovono proventi delle concessioni d’uso delle frequenze cedute ai gestori delle compagnie telefoniche. In ballo ci sono business vertiginosi, ma pure l’interesse del benessere della cittadinanza. Questo il punto: come coniugare progresso tecnologico con la prevenzioneverso nuove patologie altamente invalidanti.
Fin dove si continuerà ad avere la spregiudicata ostinazione di negare l’evidenza? Quando ci si deciderà a demarcare un punto di non ritorno (Renzi è pronto ad innalzare la soglia d’esposizione a 61 V/m?) visto che molteplici segnali cumulativi (Tolosa non è un indizio, ma un precedente!) ci dicono chiaramente che il filo s’è spezzato da tempo? E che non c’è poi tanto altro tempo da attendere? L’ubiquitaria e tutt’altro che precauzionale presenza di campi elettromagnetici artificiali e nocivi per l’umanità (e non solo!), rappresenta un grosso limite alla personale libertà di scelta sulla gestione della propria vita e della propria salute. Come la vicenda della giovane francese in fuga sulle montagne dei Pirenei ci insegna, anche in Italia c’è un mondo sommerso di elettrosensibili che tra l’indifferenza generale fugge dall’elettrosmog, attendendo il riconoscimento dei più elementari diritti del malato (per altro, disattesi proprio dagli stessi soggetti ‘inquinanti’). E’ ora di fare chiarezza, senza ambiguità: anche gli elettroscettici dovranno farsene una ragione, visto che in ballo c’è la salute di tutti (e non solo di quanti, ad oggi, sono già finiti dentro la ragnatela del male). Ma perché devono essere sempre i giudici a ricordarcelo?”
